This is still substantial compared to Intel parts, but it's half of what you get with the 5900X, as that higher-end processor packs two CCDs with 6 cores enabled. The 5600X features a single CCD with 6 cores enabled, which means it's limited to a 32MB 元 cache. In the meantime, we've got a somewhat pricey 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5600X to check out and we're very keen to see how it compares to not just the Ryzen 5 3600, but also the Ryzen 7 3700X, and how it stacks up against Intel's Core i5-10600K. As a side note, the rumor mill has been churning out reports of a Ryzen 5 5600, a non-X version which might arrive at around $220, just 10% more than the beloved 3600. Though we're sure AMD would have preferred we use the 3600X or 3600XT, we'll stick to the more popular vanilla 3600. Therefore, most opted for the $200 Ryzen 5 3600, which is what we widely recommended in the past year as the best value CPU, and that's the part we'll be comparing the 5600X to today.
However this third-gen processor already didn't make sense as it cost 25% more than the R5 3600 and offered little extra performance. Positioned as a mainstream part, it's coming in at $300, a 20% premium over the Ryzen 5 3600X. It's time we finally check out the Ryzen 5 5600X, the most affordable Ryzen 5000 series processor announced to date.
0 kommentar(er)
